If someone wants to re-do everything in OpenSCAD after I'm done, I'll even send them some free stuff. But that paves the way for anyone to come along after I've done the hard part of designing, to be able to modify pieces at will. However, I don't think it's too unreasonable to use a proprietary tool as long as you export to STL (and optionally make a 2D print in case people wanted to recreate in another program (Gasp. Too many interlocking pieces, too many things that OpenSCAD won't do. There's no way that I would ever have enough time and patience to use it. My project is a combo 3D printer / pick and place SMT manufacturing system. And although I like to have some compile time to slack off, I'd never get anything done if I did my design in OpenSCAD. It's easy to get bogged down in the math, and just like in the software world, bugs creep in. Because it is really hard to line all that stuff up with just a text editor. Anyone that has actually looked at the Prusa Mendel i2 files, and really looked at them, will realize that the vertex brackets and Y motor bracket never really lined up. I know that's harsh, but it still doesn't support fillets and other stupid-simple stuff. Try as many as you can and find what works best for you. Blender seems unintuitive to me.įreecad I started learning, but then I started working with Solidworks, which I like better. I could work twenty times faster with wysiwig than I could with a text editor.īlender and Sketchup, some people love it, others hate it. For me, it makes sense logically, but reminds me of old web design software, before we had wysiwig. On the other hand, if reading code is torture, you will hate it. Openscad, if you like programming, it will be your friend. This was especially problematic when they promoted it as a step up from Tinkercad (same owner), which pretty much only allows STL export, making it useless for anyone who had designed a bunch in Tinkercad. Yes, I know STL is an output format, but a program designed for STL's from the start should have been able to import them, from the start. I have no idea if they fixed this shortcoming yet, I haven't bothered or cared to look. Word is they are working on a standalone version.ġ23Dcad is supposed to be similar or a step up from Tinkecad, but the first releases didn't allow STL imports and I uninstalled it. You could design an entire car with it, but you would probably crash/tax their servers a ton. Same with Tinkercad, if you are creative, it can do amazing things, but you have to think outside the box and have A LOT of patience. Yes, you could do the Mona Lisa with MS Paint, but there are better programs for that. However, you have to remember, Tinkercad is the MS Paint of cad programs. Tinkercad is awesome for doing simple, quick stuff that doesn't require high precision.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |